## SIMD Instruction Format

Did you know, that Intel has a naming scheme for their SIMD instructions? Neither did I.

I found, by watching a CppCon talk by Tim Haines, that

SIMD instruction have a pre-defined scheme which can be used to easily decode the, sometimes, cryptic mnemonics.

To much of my surprise, it’s not mentioned nor explained in any of Intel’s manuals.

## Format

An instruction is composed of these parts:

```
[PREFIX][OPCODE][ALIGNMENT][PACKING][PRECISION]
```

**PREFIX** *(Optional)*: Whether the instruction is AVX or SSE. Possible values: A[V]X, or left out

**OPCODE**: The operation to perform. Possible values: Any basic arithmetic instruction (e.g ADD/SUB/MUL), MOV

**ALIGNMENT** *(Optional)*: The alignment requirements of the data, only applicable to a few instructions. Possible values: [A]ligned, [U]naligned

**PACKING**: Whether it’s a packed operation or operation on a single scalar. Possible values: [P]acked, [S]calar

**PRECISION**: Whether it operates on single or double precision floats. Possible values: [S]ingle-Precision float, [D]ouble-Precision float

### Examples

**MOVAPD**: [MOV][A][P][D]. [MOV]e [A]ligned [P]acked [D]ouble-Precision float

**SUBSS**: [SUB][S][S]. [SUB]tract [S]calar [S]ingle-Precision float

**VMOVSS**: [V][MOV][S][S]. A[V]X [MOV]e [S]calar [S]ingle-Precision float

## Caveat

This does only apply to a few basic instructions, namely the basic arithmetic and MOV instructions.

Many instructions, added later in SSE2/3/4 are very specialized, which can be applied vertically or horizontally, use non-temporal stores, etc.

## Feedback

Feedback, criticism? Tweet me at @ArvidGerstmann.